Three letters about the rape

In the article “Four marines investigated for rape,” a matter the author says is people who raped were marines of U.S. The author shows the response of the U.S. Marine Corps Iwakuni Air Station and Defense Minister Shigeru Ishiba. These responses seem convincing.


Now, let’s move on to “Don't judge marines too fast” which is against the previous article. This author says there is nothing we can know from the invitation, and insist the importance of U.S. military. The author says how do Japanese protect themselves If U.S. military remove from Japan?


This importance of U.S. military is convincing. By showing Japanese defense system which relies on U.S. the author makes Japanese people think they should not punish the four marines. However, this letter seems to hide the fact of rape.


There is a letter “Disgusting outlook on women” against “Don't judge marines too fast.” The author says Japan does not allow U.S military to do whatever they want to. This is logical and this letter completely criticizes Sandoval well.


These three letters are convincing each other, but the one of Sandoval seems weak. And the one of Egan criticizes Sandoval well. It’s difficult to decide if the rape is true, but the letters against the four are much stronger.