Baby Drop Off

Today, I'll talk about Baby Drop Off.

Two people talk about facility for unwanted infants. I want to analyze how they try to explain or make us believe.

Letter 1

The author talks about his experience. She works with disabled adults, some of whom were abandoned, and she says overcoming losses of significant people is a major issue for such people.

The author talks about the facts. People can abandon infant children, but a 3-year-old toddler were found in the facility.

Using one's experiences allows readers to be in there or feel the author's feelings. I could know why she want to insist like Letter 1 because I could know her situation. The more we know the person, the more we can trust. Using experience is good way.

Using facts is more effective because they are "facts." Facts allow readers to trust easily. We can think about the problem carefully because it was occured actually.

Letter 2

The author shows an occurence in Japan some years ago. A baby of a junior high school student and her boyfriend wa abandoned in a nearby temple in cold weather and died.

Showing a fact makes people trust easily. This is an effect way.

My opinion

I agree with the author of Letter 1. Perhaps there are some people who can not afford to raise children because of money problem. However, are all people who abandon their child suffering from money problem or in the situation that they really can not raise their child? I think not they aren't.

Surely, the Baby Hatch is a good idea. This can save children from death. However, People should rather live with thier children in any case than abondon them. So, I agree the idea of the agency. This is big scale, but the goverment should do. I think it's better way to save children better than set the Baby Hatch.